Feiling Yang

679 citations
38 papers · 509 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Feiling Yang

30 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Feiling Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecological Modeling 94
  • Global and Planetary Change 320
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 122
  • Ecology 170
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 60
Replace Marina Kohler with:
Marina Kohler Austria
Henrike Schulte to Bühne United Kingdom
Andrea E. Izquierdo Argentina
Florencia Pulhin Philippines
Mingchang Cao China
Convention sur la diversité biologique. Secrétariat
Mingxing Zhong China
S. Vazeed Pasha India
Elena Bukvareva Russia
Jacqueline de Chazal Australia
Feiling Yang relative to Marina Kohler Austria Marina Kohler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Marina Kohler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feiling Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feiling Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feiling Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feiling Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feiling Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feiling Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feiling Yang. The network helps show where Feiling Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feiling Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feiling Yang Line = papers co-authored together Feiling Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017118
2 201957
3 201951
4 201936
5 201632
6 201829
7 201925
8 201618
9 202317
10 201816
11 202115
12 201915
13 201113
14 20228
15 20238
16 20237
17 20215
18 20215
19 20215
20 20254

About Feiling Yang

Feiling Yang is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (16 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (13 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (9 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (94 citations), Global and Planetary Change (320 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (122 citations), Ecology (170 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (60 citations). Feiling Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ruidong Wu, Junjun Wang, Wei Wu, Shiwei Lin, Jinming Hu, Haiwei Zhao, Yang Guo, Jianzhong Ma, Tong Jin and Yongcheng Long. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Biological Conservation, Scientific Reports, Ecological Indicators and Conservation Science and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact