Fedor K. Popov
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- É. T. AkhmedovIgor R. KlebanovGrigory TarnopolskyKiryl PakrouskiAlexey MilekhinUgo MoschellaHadi GodazgarYifan Wang
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (25 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (15 papers)Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaItaly
In The Last Decade
Fedor K. Popov
37 papers receiving 749 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 415
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 406
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 338
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 198
- Condensed Matter Physics 91
Countries citing papers authored by Fedor K. Popov
This map shows the geographic impact of Fedor K. Popov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fedor K. Popov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fedor K. Popov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fedor K. Popov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fedor K. Popov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fedor K. Popov. The network helps show where Fedor K. Popov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fedor K. Popov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fedor K. Popov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fedor K. Popov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fedor K. Popov. Fedor K. Popov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 48 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 86 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Fedor K. Popov
Fedor K. Popov is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (25 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (15 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (415 citations), Computational Mathematics (14 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (338 citations). Fedor K. Popov has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include É. T. Akhmedov, Igor R. Klebanov, Grigory Tarnopolsky, Kiryl Pakrouski, Alexey Milekhin, Ugo Moschella, Hadi Godazgar, Yifan Wang, Juan Maldacena and Nikita Astrakhantsev. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.