Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Countries citing papers authored by Juan Maldacena
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Juan Maldacena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juan Maldacena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juan Maldacena more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juan Maldacena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juan Maldacena. The network helps show where Juan Maldacena may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juan Maldacena
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juan Maldacena.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juan Maldacena based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Juan Maldacena. Juan Maldacena is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Yue-Zhou, et al.. (2025). The no boundary density matrix. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2025(2).8 indexed citations
2.
Maldacena, Juan, et al.. (2024). Three point amplitudes in matrix theory. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 57(16). 165401–165401.8 indexed citations
Almheiri, Ahmed, Thomas Hartman, Juan Maldacena, Edgar Shaghoulian, & Amirhossein Tajdini. (2021). The entropy of Hawking radiation. Reviews of Modern Physics. 93(3).397 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Almheiri, Ahmed, Thomas Hartman, Juan Maldacena, Edgar Shaghoulian, & Amirhossein Tajdini. (2020). Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2020(5).499 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Gaiotto, Davide, Juan Maldacena, Amit Sever, & Pedro Vieira. (2016). Pulling the straps of polygons.76 indexed citations
12.
Lewkowycz, Aitor & Juan Maldacena. (2013). Generalized gravitational entropy. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013(8).632 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Maldacena, Juan & Alexander Zhiboedov. (2013). Constraining conformal field theories with a higher spin symmetry. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 46(21). 214011–214011.279 indexed citations breakdown →
Bachas, Constantin P., et al.. (2001). Proceedings of the Trieste 2000 Spring Workshop on Superstrings and Related Matters, ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 27 March - 4 April 2000. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Atiyah, Michael, Juan Maldacena, & Cumrun Vafa. (2001). An M-theory flop as a large N duality. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 42(7). 3209–3220.138 indexed citations
19.
Maldacena, Juan. (2000). Strings in AdS{sub 3} and the SL(2,R) WZW Model. Part 1: The spectrum. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).2 indexed citations
20.
Maldacena, Juan. (1999). The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. AIP conference proceedings. 51–63.872 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.