Federico Iannacci

20 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Federico Iannacci
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Political Science and International Relations 191
  • Sociology and Political Science 140
  • Management Information Systems 85
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 63
  • Strategy and Management 56
Replace Edimara Mezzomo Luciano with:
Edimara Mezzomo Luciano Brazil
Fadi Salem United Kingdom
Fernando Filgueiras Brazil
Alon Peled Israel
Ali A. Guenduez Switzerland
Luca Tangi Italy
Nicolau Reinhard Brazil
Adalmir de Oliveira Gomes Brazil
Herbert Kubicek Germany
Meghan Cook United States
Federico Iannacci relative to Edimara Mezzomo Luciano Brazil Edimara Mezzomo Luciano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Edimara Mezzomo Luciano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federico Iannacci

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Iannacci's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Iannacci with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Iannacci more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Iannacci

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Iannacci. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Iannacci. The network helps show where Federico Iannacci may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federico Iannacci

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federico Iannacci. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federico Iannacci based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Federico Iannacci. Federico Iannacci is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 13
4 28
5 1
6 1
7 5
8 17
9 42
10 25
11
On routines and generative systems: investigating the emergence of duty prosecutors using critical realist case study principles
1
12
Explaining social media acceptance by business-to-business SMEs in the South-East of England: a theory-enhanced qualitative comparative analysis
1
13 20
14 32
15 182
16 7
17 5
18
Coordination processes in open source software development: the Linux case study
14
19 9
20 6

About Federico Iannacci

Federico Iannacci is a scholar working on Public Administration, Health Informatics and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include E-Government and Public Services (6 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (6 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (47 citations), Management Information Systems (85 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (63 citations). Federico Iannacci has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Cordella, Tony Cornford, Andrea Resca, C. Blok, Colm Fearon, Boyka Simeonova, Eve Mitleton‐Kelly, Peter Kawalek, Simos Chari and Hameed Chughtai. Their work appears in journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, European Journal of Information Systems and The Journal of Strategic Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026