Federica Cacciamani
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Physiology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Geoffroy GagliardiStéphane EpelbaumRaffaella MigliaccioBruno DuboisMarion HouotPaolo EusebiViviana LisettiPaolo Calabresi
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers)Neurological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Psychiatry and Mental healthCognitive NeuroscienceNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Federica Cacciamani
15 papers receiving 176 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Psychiatry and Mental health 119
- Cognitive Neuroscience 90
- Physiology 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 29
- Neurology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Federica Cacciamani
This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Cacciamani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Cacciamani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Cacciamani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Cacciamani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Cacciamani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Cacciamani. The network helps show where Federica Cacciamani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federica Cacciamani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federica Cacciamani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federica Cacciamani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Federica Cacciamani. Federica Cacciamani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2 |
About Federica Cacciamani
Federica Cacciamani is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers) and Neurological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (119 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Federica Cacciamani has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Geoffroy Gagliardi, Stéphane Epelbaum, Raffaella Migliaccio, Bruno Dubois, Marion Houot, Paolo Eusebi, Viviana Lisetti, Paolo Calabresi, Lucilla Parnetti and Nicola Salvadori. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Experimental Gerontology and Alzheimer s & Dementia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.