Farah Naaz

607 citations
20 papers · 402 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers)Anatomy and Medical Technology (5 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Farah Naaz

19 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

Farah Naaz
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 211
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 108
  • Biomedical Engineering 96
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 65
  • Surgery 65
Replace Gijs A. Holleman with:
Gijs A. Holleman Netherlands
Joseph Schmidt United States
Cristina Simões‐Franklin Ireland
Benjamin Schöne Germany
Yichuan Liu United States
Barbara Manini Italy
Yoshiyuki Aoyama Japan
Eva‐Maria Reuter Germany
Yukako Sasaki Japan
Mary H. MacLean United States
Farah Naaz relative to Gijs A. Holleman Netherlands Gijs A. Holleman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Gijs A. Holleman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Farah Naaz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Farah Naaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Farah Naaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Farah Naaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Farah Naaz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Farah Naaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Farah Naaz. The network helps show where Farah Naaz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Farah Naaz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Farah Naaz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Farah Naaz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Farah Naaz. Farah Naaz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 15
3 23
4 2
5 8
6 29
7 30
8
Memory and Technology: How We Use Information in the Brain and the World
14
9 3
10 7
11 4
12 5
13 4
14 127
15 11
16 6
17 16
18 27
19 25
20 45

About Farah Naaz

Farah Naaz is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (5 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (211 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (108 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations). Farah Naaz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brendan E. Depue, John R. Pani, Julia H. Chariker, Marie T. Banich, Joseph M. Orr, Harry R. Smolker, Jason R. Finley, Teodora Stoica, Samantha C. Patton and Kathleen B. McDermott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Cerebral Cortex and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026