Fanny De Vloed
About
In The Last Decade
Fanny De Vloed
4 papers receiving 162 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Molecular Biology 137
- Cancer Research 30
- Genetics 16
- Neurology 13
- Plant Science 10
Countries citing papers authored by Fanny De Vloed
This map shows the geographic impact of Fanny De Vloed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fanny De Vloed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fanny De Vloed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fanny De Vloed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fanny De Vloed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fanny De Vloed. The network helps show where Fanny De Vloed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fanny De Vloed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fanny De Vloed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fanny De Vloed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fanny De Vloed. Fanny De Vloed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 143 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.