Fabian Baum
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatric care and mental health services
-
- Health and Medical Studies
Papers in
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 13
-
- Health and Medical Studies 6
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 1
- Co-authors
- Anne Neumann (16 shared papers)Andrea Pfennig (13 shared papers)Jochen Schmitt (17 shared papers)Enno Swart (14 shared papers)Stefanie March (9 shared papers)Dennis Häckl (10 shared papers)Martin Seifert (11 shared papers)Olaf Schoffer (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (4 papers)BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)BMC Health Services Research (2 papers)European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (1 paper)Shock (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandAustria
In The Last Decade
Fabian Baum
21 papers receiving 157 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Clinical Psychology 95
- General Health Professions 47
- Psychiatry and Mental health 23
- Social Psychology 20
- Philosophy 9
Countries citing papers authored by Fabian Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Fabian Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabian Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabian Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fabian Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabian Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabian Baum. The network helps show where Fabian Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fabian Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 1 |
About Fabian Baum
Fabian Baum is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers), Health and Medical Studies (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), MRI in cancer diagnosis (1 paper) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (95 citations), General Health Professions (47 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (23 citations), Social Psychology (20 citations) and Philosophy (9 citations). Fabian Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Anne Neumann, Andrea Pfennig, Jochen Schmitt, Enno Swart, Stefanie March, Dennis Häckl, Martin Seifert, Olaf Schoffer, Katrin Arnold and Julian Schwarz. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry, BMC Health Services Research, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience and Shock.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.