Elna Stenström

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Elna Stenström is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Elna Stenström has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Plant Science, 15 papers in Cell Biology and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Elna Stenström's work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (16 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (15 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers). Elna Stenström is often cited by papers focused on Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (16 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (15 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers). Elna Stenström collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Canada and France. Elna Stenström's co-authors include Jan Stenlid, Katarina Ihrmark, Lawrence Behers, Salme Timmusk, Gulaim A. Seisenbaeva, Astrid Kännaste, Eviatar Nevo, Islam A. Abd El-Daim, Ülo Niinemets and Lucian Copolovici and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, New Phytologist and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

Elna Stenström

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Drought-Tolerance of Wheat Improved by Rhizosphere Bacter... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elna Stenström Sweden 19 1.1k 274 266 185 149 26 1.2k
J. D. Mihail United States 18 1.1k 1.1× 497 1.8× 114 0.4× 160 0.9× 167 1.1× 62 1.3k
Johann N. Bruhn United States 18 914 0.9× 407 1.5× 237 0.9× 212 1.1× 380 2.6× 51 1.2k
Christine Delaruelle France 18 1.1k 1.0× 343 1.3× 267 1.0× 356 1.9× 233 1.6× 22 1.2k
Geral I. McDonald United States 18 622 0.6× 344 1.3× 97 0.4× 331 1.8× 188 1.3× 65 894
Greg W. Douhan United States 22 1.4k 1.3× 665 2.4× 525 2.0× 242 1.3× 171 1.1× 53 1.5k
Michal Tomšovský Czechia 19 1.1k 1.1× 679 2.5× 231 0.9× 343 1.9× 281 1.9× 96 1.3k
Sarah E. Bergemann United States 15 977 0.9× 476 1.7× 445 1.7× 135 0.7× 234 1.6× 35 1.1k
Ulrike Krauss Costa Rica 22 669 0.6× 330 1.2× 114 0.4× 122 0.7× 60 0.4× 44 1.2k
Richard E. Baird United States 17 964 0.9× 422 1.5× 135 0.5× 120 0.6× 34 0.2× 93 1.1k
Norihisa Matsushita Japan 16 682 0.6× 215 0.8× 253 1.0× 121 0.7× 228 1.5× 64 853

Countries citing papers authored by Elna Stenström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elna Stenström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elna Stenström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elna Stenström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elna Stenström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elna Stenström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elna Stenström. The network helps show where Elna Stenström may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elna Stenström

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elna Stenström. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elna Stenström based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elna Stenström. Elna Stenström is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Xiaoming, et al.. (2017). Outbreaks of Gremmeniella abietina cause considerable decline in stem growth of surviving Scots pine trees. Dendrochronologia. 44. 39–47. 9 indexed citations
3.
Nguyen, Diem Thi, Johanna Boberg, Katarina Ihrmark, Elna Stenström, & Jan Stenlid. (2016). Do foliar fungal communities of Norway spruce shift along a tree species diversity gradient in mature European forests?. Fungal ecology. 23. 97–108. 37 indexed citations
4.
Oliva, Jonàs, et al.. (2016). Pathogen-induced defoliation of Pinus sylvestris leads to tree decline and death from secondary biotic factors. Forest Ecology and Management. 379. 273–280. 24 indexed citations
5.
Timmusk, Salme, Islam A. Abd El-Daim, Lucian Copolovici, et al.. (2014). Drought-Tolerance of Wheat Improved by Rhizosphere Bacteria from Harsh Environments: Enhanced Biomass Production and Reduced Emissions of Stress Volatiles. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e96086–e96086. 411 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Stenström, Elna, et al.. (2013). Root-associated fungi of healthy-lookingPinus sylvestrisandPicea abiesseedlings in Swedish forest nurseries. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 29(1). 12–21. 24 indexed citations
7.
Stenström, Elna & Katarina Ihrmark. (2005). Identification ofLophodermium seditiosumandL. pinastriin Swedish forest nurseries using species‐specific PCR primers from the ribosomal ITS region. Forest Pathology. 35(3). 163–172. 19 indexed citations
8.
Menkis, Audrius, Rimvydas Vasiliauskas, Andy F. S. Taylor, et al.. (2005). Fungi in decayed roots of conifer seedlings in forest nurseries, afforested clear‐cuts and abandoned farmland. Plant Pathology. 55(1). 117–129. 74 indexed citations
9.
Stenlid, Jan, et al.. (2004). Potential for Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea in Pinus sylvestris Seedlings. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 19(4). 312–319. 22 indexed citations
10.
Pohanka, Anton, et al.. (2004). Enniatins ofFusariumsp. Strain F31 and Their Inhibition ofBotrytiscinereaSpore Germination. Journal of Natural Products. 67(5). 851–857. 29 indexed citations
11.
Ihrmark, Katarina, Elna Stenström, & Jan Stenlid. (2004). Double-stranded RNA transmission through basidiospores of Heterobasidion annosum. Mycological Research. 108(2). 149–153. 35 indexed citations
12.
Ihrmark, Katarina, Hanna Johannesson, Elna Stenström, & Jan Stenlid. (2002). Transmission of double-stranded RNA in Heterobasidion annosum. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 36(2). 147–154. 74 indexed citations
13.
Ihrmark, Katarina, et al.. (2001). Presence of double‐stranded RNA in Heterobasidion annosum. Forest Pathology. 31(6). 387–394. 20 indexed citations
14.
Stenström, Elna, et al.. (2001). Fungicidal Control of Lophodermium seditiosum on Pinus sylvestris Seedlings in Swedish Forest Nurseries. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 16(2). 147–154. 13 indexed citations
15.
16.
Dahlberg, Anders & Elna Stenström. (1991). Dynamic changes in nursery and indigenous mycorrhiza ofPinus sylvestris seedlings planted out in forest and clearcuts. Plant and Soil. 136(1). 73–86. 62 indexed citations
17.
Stenström, Elna, et al.. (1990). Variation in field response of Pinussylvestris to nursery inoculation with four different ectomycorrhizal fungi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 20(11). 1796–1803. 29 indexed citations
18.
Stenström, Elna. (1990). The importance of infection methods and root environment on mycorrhiza formation. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 28(1-4). 479–482. 1 indexed citations
19.
Unestam, Torgny & Elna Stenström. (1989). A method for observing and manipulating roots and root associated fungi on plants growing in nonsterile substrates. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 4(1-4). 51–58. 18 indexed citations
20.
Ljungquist, Pierre, et al.. (1983). INDOLE‐3‐ACETIC ACID PRODUCTION BY MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI DETERMINED BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY‐MASS SPECTROMETRY. New Phytologist. 94(3). 401–407. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026