F. Salemi

80.1k total citations
26 papers, 795 citations indexed

About

F. Salemi is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Salemi has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 795 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6 papers in Geophysics and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in F. Salemi's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (24 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers). F. Salemi is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (24 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers). F. Salemi collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. F. Salemi's co-authors include G. Vedovato, G. A. Prodi, M. Drago, S. Klimenko, G. Mitselmakher, Shubhanshu Tiwari, C. Lazzaro, V. Tiwari, K. Ackley and S. Vinciguerra and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical review. D.

In The Last Decade

F. Salemi

25 papers receiving 766 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
F. Salemi 688 158 118 95 79 26 795
Alvin J. K. Chua 889 1.3× 110 0.7× 64 0.5× 200 2.1× 95 1.2× 40 988
W. G. Anderson 827 1.2× 194 1.2× 117 1.0× 208 2.2× 110 1.4× 26 907
M. A. Bizouard 590 0.9× 97 0.6× 108 0.9× 301 3.2× 47 0.6× 33 699
T. D. Abbott 650 0.9× 113 0.7× 63 0.5× 145 1.5× 82 1.0× 9 691
C. Talbot 1.2k 1.7× 157 1.0× 75 0.6× 232 2.4× 174 2.2× 34 1.2k
B. Farr 1.3k 1.9× 210 1.3× 69 0.6× 200 2.1× 181 2.3× 34 1.3k
Lindy Blackburn 441 0.6× 73 0.5× 63 0.5× 182 1.9× 46 0.6× 33 508
S. Ballmer 728 1.1× 101 0.6× 270 2.3× 157 1.7× 104 1.3× 32 909
Nils Deppe 707 1.0× 84 0.5× 50 0.4× 347 3.7× 55 0.7× 42 823
Vicky Kalogera 1.6k 2.4× 128 0.8× 80 0.7× 280 2.9× 83 1.1× 48 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by F. Salemi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Salemi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Salemi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Salemi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Salemi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Salemi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Salemi. The network helps show where F. Salemi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Salemi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Salemi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Salemi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Salemi. F. Salemi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Szczepańczyk, M. J., F. Salemi, S. Bini, et al.. (2023). Search for gravitational-wave bursts in the third Advanced LIGO-Virgo run with coherent WaveBurst enhanced by machine learning. Physical review. D. 107(6). 12 indexed citations
2.
Bini, S., G. Vedovato, M. Drago, F. Salemi, & G. A. Prodi. (2023). An autoencoder neural network integrated into gravitational-wave burst searches to improve the rejection of noise transients. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 40(13). 135008–135008. 12 indexed citations
3.
Mishra, T., M. J. Szczepańczyk, G. Vedovato, et al.. (2022). Search for binary black hole mergers in the third observing run of Advanced LIGO-Virgo using coherent WaveBurst enhanced with machine learning. Physical review. D. 105(8). 12 indexed citations
4.
Vedovato, G., E. Milotti, G. A. Prodi, et al.. (2021). Minimally-modeled search of higher multipole gravitational-wave radiation in compact binary coalescences. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 39(4). 45001–45001. 3 indexed citations
5.
Szczepańczyk, M. J., S. Klimenko, I. Bartos, et al.. (2021). Observing an intermediate-mass black hole GW190521 with minimal assumptions. Physical review. D. 103(8). 18 indexed citations
6.
Drago, M., S. Klimenko, C. Lazzaro, et al.. (2021). coherent WaveBurst, a pipeline for unmodeled gravitational-wave data analysis. SoftwareX. 14. 100678–100678. 50 indexed citations
7.
Bersanetti, D., B. Patricelli, O. J. Piccinni, et al.. (2021). Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects. Universe. 7(9). 322–322. 18 indexed citations
8.
Gayathri, V., P. Bacon, A. Pai, et al.. (2019). Astrophysical signal consistency test adapted for gravitational-wave transient searches. Physical review. D. 100(12). 5 indexed citations
9.
Salemi, F., E. Milotti, G. A. Prodi, et al.. (2019). Wider look at the gravitational-wave transients from GWTC-1 using an unmodeled reconstruction method. Physical review. D. 100(4). 19 indexed citations
10.
Bacon, P., V. Gayathri, E. Chassande‐Mottin, et al.. (2018). Driving unmodeled gravitational-wave transient searches using astrophysical information. Physical review. D. 98(2). 4 indexed citations
11.
Bustillo, J. Calderón, F. Salemi, T. Dal Canton, & K. Jani. (2018). Sensitivity of gravitational wave searches to the full signal of intermediate-mass black hole binaries during the first observing run of Advanced LIGO. Physical review. D. 97(2). 28 indexed citations
12.
Kanner, J. B., T. B. Littenberg, Neil J. Cornish, et al.. (2016). Leveraging waveform complexity for confident detection of gravitational waves. Physical review. D. 93(2). 31 indexed citations
13.
Tiwari, V., M. Drago, В. В. Фролов, et al.. (2015). Regression of environmental noise in LIGO data. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 32(16). 165014–165014. 24 indexed citations
14.
Klimenko, S., G. Vedovato, M. Drago, et al.. (2011). Localization of gravitational wave sources with networks of advanced detectors. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 83(10). 61 indexed citations
15.
Bonaldi, M., L. Conti, Paolo De Gregorio, et al.. (2009). Nonequilibrium Steady-State Fluctuations in Actively Cooled Resonators. Physical Review Letters. 103(1). 10601–10601. 43 indexed citations
16.
Vinante, Andrea, M. Bignotto, M. Bonaldi, et al.. (2008). Feedback Cooling of the Normal Modes of a Massive Electromechanical System to Submillikelvin Temperature. Physical Review Letters. 101(3). 33601–33601. 45 indexed citations
17.
Salemi, F., et al.. (2006). Status of the LIGO-AURIGA Joint Burst Analysis. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 32. 198–205.
18.
Baggio, Lucio, M. Bignotto, M. Bonaldi, et al.. (2005). 3-Mode Detection for Widening the Bandwidth of Resonant Gravitational Wave Detectors. Physical Review Letters. 94(24). 43 indexed citations
19.
Cadonati, L., Lucio Baggio, I. S. Heng, et al.. (2005). The AURIGA–LIGO joint burst search. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 22(18). S1337–S1347. 2 indexed citations
20.
Heng, I. S., F. Salemi, & A. Ortolan. (2003). Methods for multi-detector burst gravitational wave search. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 20(17). S617–S622. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026