F. Raw
Impact in
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
-
- Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Study of Mite Species
Papers in
-
- Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology 4
- Diptera species taxonomy and behavior 2
-
- Insect behavior and control techniques 4
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control 3
- Co-authors
- J. R. Lofty (3 shared papers)R. M. Jackson (1 shared paper)D. C. Griffiths (1 shared paper)C. Potter (3 shared papers)M. J. R. Healy (1 shared paper)P. H. Gregory (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bulletin of Entomological Research (6 papers)Plant Pathology (5 papers)Annals of Applied Biology (4 papers)Nature (2 papers)Journal of Paleontology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGhana
In The Last Decade
F. Raw
24 papers receiving 526 citations
F. Raw's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Soil Science 207
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 365
- Insect Science 139
- Ecology 217
- Horticulture 5
Countries citing papers authored by F. Raw
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Raw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Raw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Raw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Raw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Raw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Raw. The network helps show where F. Raw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside F. Raw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estimating Earthworm Populations by Using Formalin Hit paper breakdown → | 1959 | 315 |
| 2 | 1962 | 105 | |
| 3 | 1960 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1951 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1967 | 21 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 17 | |
| 7 | Life in the soil | 1966 | 15 |
| 8 | 1967 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1952 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1960 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1954 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1956 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 8 | |
| 14 | The external morphology of the trilobite and its significance | 1953 | 7 |
| 15 | 1956 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1958 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1959 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1957 | 5 | |
| 19 | Outline of a theory of origin of the vertebrate | 1960 | 4 |
| 20 | 1958 | 4 |
About F. Raw
F. Raw is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (4 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (4 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (3 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers) and Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (207 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (365 citations), Insect Science (139 citations), Ecology (217 citations) and Horticulture (5 citations). F. Raw has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include J. R. Lofty, R. M. Jackson, D. C. Griffiths, C. Potter, M. J. R. Healy and P. H. Gregory. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Entomological Research, Plant Pathology, Annals of Applied Biology, Nature and Journal of Paleontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.