F. R. Nash
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Materials Chemistry
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Co-authors
- R. L. HartmanG. D. BoydMichael PechtR. W. DixonJ. A. GiordmaineE. H. TurnerB.W. HakkiP. M. Bridenbaugh
- Topics
- Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (13 papers)Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (12 papers)Solid State Laser Technologies (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsElectrical and Electronic EngineeringInstrumentation
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaPortugal
In The Last Decade
F. R. Nash
48 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 981
- Materials Chemistry 249
- Spectroscopy 166
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 135
Countries citing papers authored by F. R. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of F. R. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. R. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. R. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. R. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. R. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. R. Nash. The network helps show where F. R. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. R. Nash
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. R. Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. R. Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. R. Nash. F. R. Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 82 | |
| 13 | 141 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | Cross Relaxation and Maser Action in Cu(NH 4 ) 2 -(SO 4 ) 2 · 6H 2 O | 0 |
| 20 | The Paramagnetic Resonance Spectrum of Fe 3+ in TiO 2 (rutile) | 1 |
About F. R. Nash
F. R. Nash is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (13 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (12 papers) and Solid State Laser Technologies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (981 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.1k citations) and Instrumentation (40 citations). F. R. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include R. L. Hartman, G. D. Boyd, Michael Pecht, R. W. Dixon, J. A. Giordmaine, E. H. Turner, B.W. Hakki, P. M. Bridenbaugh, J. G. Bergman and C. H. Townes. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.