F. P. Lock

425 citations
12 papers · 36 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

F. P. Lock

8 papers receiving 22 citations

Peers

F. P. Lock
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
  • Political Science and International Relations 23
  • History 10
  • Philosophy 7
  • Literature and Literary Theory 5
  • History and Philosophy of Science 2
Replace John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton Acton with:
John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton Acton
François Pierre Guillaume Guizot
Marcus Llanque Germany
Bruce R. O’Brien United States
John Neville Figgis
Francis Wayland
Clemens Rathe
Karl-Heinz Ziegler Netherlands
Stephen C. Ferruolo
Katalin Péter Romania
F. P. Lock relative to John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton Acton John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton Acton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton Acton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. P. Lock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. P. Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. P. Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. P. Lock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. P. Lock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. P. Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. P. Lock. The network helps show where F. P. Lock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside F. P. Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. P. Lock Line = papers co-authored together F. P. Lock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 198612
2
Swift's tory politics
19839
3 19865
4 20093
5 19812
6 20042
7 20001
8 20061
9 19971
10 20080
11 20080
12 19820

About F. P. Lock

F. P. Lock is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Anthropology and Music, having authored 12 papers that have together received 36 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper) and Authorship Attribution and Profiling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (23 citations), History (10 citations), Philosophy (7 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (5 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (2 citations). F. P. Lock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include James J. Sack, William B. Todd and David McCracken. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, The American Historical Review, Essays in Criticism, Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review and The Modern Language Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact