F. M. DEAN
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Toxicology top 5%
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
Papers in
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 7
-
- Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions 9
- Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds 6
- Co-authors
- Malcolm L. RobinsonDavid A. TaylorAlexander RobertsonR. B. MortonJohn GoodchildJohn RobertsR. A. W. JohnstoneJoseph A. Martin
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (5 papers)Nature (3 papers)Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 (3 papers)Tetrahedron (2 papers)Phytochemistry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNigeriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
F. M. DEAN
64 papers receiving 834 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Organic Chemistry 521
- Toxicology 62
- Pharmacology 295
- Biotechnology 53
- Biochemistry 42
Countries citing papers authored by F. M. DEAN
This map shows the geographic impact of F. M. DEAN's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. M. DEAN with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. M. DEAN more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. M. DEAN
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. M. DEAN. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. M. DEAN. The network helps show where F. M. DEAN may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. M. DEAN, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 17 | |
| 2 | 1974 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1971 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1967 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 70 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1957 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1956 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1956 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1955 | 3 |
About F. M. DEAN
F. M. DEAN is a scholar working on Toxicology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 67 papers that have together received 918 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis of Organic Compounds (12 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (9 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (7 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (7 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (6 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (521 citations), Toxicology (62 citations), Pharmacology (295 citations), Biotechnology (53 citations) and Biochemistry (42 citations). F. M. DEAN has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Nigeria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm L. Robinson, David A. Taylor, Alexander Robertson, R. B. Morton, John Goodchild, John Roberts, R. A. W. Johnstone, Joseph A. Martin, H. D. Locksley and Alexander Robertson. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Nature, Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1, Tetrahedron and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.