H. D. Locksley
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Synthesis of Organic Compounds
- Biological and pharmacological studies of plants
Papers in
- Pharmacology 16
- Biological and pharmacological studies of plants 9
- Synthesis of Organic Compounds 8
-
- Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies 21
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 9
- Co-authors
- Feodor ScheinmannIan CarpenterI. G. MurrayIan F. MooreGünter WulffDan MullerW. Keller‐SchierleinB. Franck
- Journals
- Phytochemistry (5 papers)Planta Medica (3 papers)Tetrahedron (2 papers)Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 (2 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomTanzaniaGermany
In The Last Decade
H. D. Locksley
38 papers receiving 728 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Plant Science 470
- Pharmacology 176
- Toxicology 31
- Pharmacology 69
- Complementary and alternative medicine 47
Countries citing papers authored by H. D. Locksley
This map shows the geographic impact of H. D. Locksley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. D. Locksley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. D. Locksley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. D. Locksley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. D. Locksley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. D. Locksley. The network helps show where H. D. Locksley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. D. Locksley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1982 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1973 | 188 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1971 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1971 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1970 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1970 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 27 | |
| 12 | 1969 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1969 | 99 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1968 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1967 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1967 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1966 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1966 | 14 |
About H. D. Locksley
H. D. Locksley is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Plant Science, Complementary and alternative medicine, Organic Chemistry and Toxicology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (21 papers), Biological and pharmacological studies of plants (9 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (9 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (8 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers) and Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (470 citations), Pharmacology (176 citations), Toxicology (31 citations), Pharmacology (69 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (47 citations). H. D. Locksley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Feodor Scheinmann, Ian Carpenter, I. G. Murray, Ian F. Moore, Günter Wulff, Dan Muller, W. Keller‐Schierlein, B. Franck, L. Jaenicke and H. Flasch. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Planta Medica, Tetrahedron, Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 and Tetrahedron Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.