F. Dannheim

497 citations
28 papers · 357 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

F. Dannheim

27 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

F. Dannheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Ophthalmology 283
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 197
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Epidemiology 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 30
Replace Daniel Snydacker with:
Daniel Snydacker
Itay Ben-Zion Israel
Murray Fingeret United States
Alec M. Ansons United Kingdom
P. Niesel Switzerland
Lars Fris�n Sweden
Gordon Heron United Kingdom
Jonathan Denniss United Kingdom
E. Krapp Germany
Jens Paetzold Germany
F. Dannheim relative to Daniel Snydacker Daniel Snydacker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel Snydacker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Dannheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Dannheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Dannheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Dannheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Dannheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Dannheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Dannheim. The network helps show where F. Dannheim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside F. Dannheim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Dannheim Line = papers co-authored together F. Dannheim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199053
2
Sensitivity and specificity of optic disc parameters in chronic glaucoma.
199353
3 200530
4 201029
5
Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages.
197124
6 198221
7 197418
8 200517
9 198014
10 200512
11 200311
12 198110
13 20069
14 20138
15 19788
16 19717
17 20067
18 19766
19 20075
20
Experimental studies on laser trabeculo-puncture.
19774

About F. Dannheim

F. Dannheim is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (2 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (283 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (197 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations), Epidemiology (59 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (30 citations). F. Dannheim has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Schiefer, Jörg Weber, D. Dannheim, Drance Sm, B. Rassow, Erik L. Greve, S. M. Drance, Bettina Wabbels, Paul H. Artes and Chris A. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Der Ophthalmologe, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Acta Ophthalmologica and Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact