David Henson

6.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
116 papers, 5.4k citations indexed

About

David Henson is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, David Henson has authored 116 papers receiving a total of 5.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Ophthalmology, 50 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 28 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in David Henson's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (70 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (35 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (28 papers). David Henson is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (70 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (35 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (28 papers). David Henson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. David Henson's co-authors include Stephen Beatty, Michael E. Boulton, Rachel V. North, Ian J. Murray, Paul H. Artes, Robert A. Harper, Balwantray C. Chauhan, Mahiul M. K. Muqit, Mike Boulton and Dave Carden and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

David Henson

113 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Hit Papers

The Role of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Age-R... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Henson United Kingdom 35 3.8k 2.2k 1.3k 666 636 116 5.4k
Gerald Liew Australia 51 5.9k 1.6× 5.3k 2.3× 1.6k 1.2× 642 1.0× 246 0.4× 206 9.2k
Sven Nilsson Sweden 39 1.3k 0.4× 620 0.3× 2.1k 1.6× 596 0.9× 242 0.4× 159 5.1k
Jonathan G. Crowston Australia 53 6.0k 1.6× 3.2k 1.4× 2.9k 2.1× 453 0.7× 59 0.1× 213 8.3k
Rohit Saxena India 30 1.8k 0.5× 1.0k 0.5× 365 0.3× 813 1.2× 61 0.1× 220 3.3k
Yi Shao China 32 753 0.2× 1.2k 0.5× 648 0.5× 404 0.6× 62 0.1× 297 3.9k
Robert Ręjdak Poland 33 2.2k 0.6× 1.3k 0.6× 868 0.6× 216 0.3× 51 0.1× 314 3.7k
Gary D. Novack United States 36 3.0k 0.8× 1.4k 0.6× 637 0.5× 201 0.3× 13 0.0× 193 4.5k
Femke H. Bouwman Netherlands 48 615 0.2× 1.2k 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 226 0.3× 16 0.0× 158 6.8k
Ivan Goldberg Australia 34 3.4k 0.9× 1.8k 0.8× 737 0.6× 367 0.6× 8 0.0× 128 4.0k
Carol A. Miller United States 28 976 0.3× 849 0.4× 1.3k 1.0× 298 0.4× 9 0.0× 66 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by David Henson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Henson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Henson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Henson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Henson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Henson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Henson. The network helps show where David Henson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Henson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Henson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Henson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Henson. David Henson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Biswas, Susmito, et al.. (2016). Normal Threshold Size of Stimuli in Children Using a Game-Based Visual Field Test. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 6(1). 115–122. 5 indexed citations
3.
Sala‐Puigdollers, Anna, Stephen Charles, Susmito Biswas, et al.. (2013). In-vivo Imaging and Measurement of the Bursa Premacularis using 1,050nm Swept-Source Deep Range Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography (DRI-OCT1 Atlantis®). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 5821–5821. 1 indexed citations
4.
Sala‐Puigdollers, Anna, Stephen Charles, Lorna B. Young, et al.. (2013). New software to assess retinal non-perfusion on Optomap® Wide-Field Fundus Fluorescein Angiography in Diabetic Macular Oedema. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 2410–2410. 3 indexed citations
5.
Muqit, Mahiul M. K., George Marcellino, David Henson, et al.. (2010). Pain responses of Pascal 20 ms multi-spot and 100 ms single-spot panretinal photocoagulation: Manchester Pascal Study, MAPASS report 2. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 94(11). 1493–1498. 60 indexed citations
6.
Artes, Paul H., et al.. (2006). Automated Analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Optic Disc Images by Glaucoma Probability Score – Comparison With Moorfields Regression Analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 4344–4344. 4 indexed citations
7.
Henson, David, et al.. (2004). Rate of functional and structural change in glaucoma suspects.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 5512–5512. 1 indexed citations
8.
Russell, W., Robert A. Harper, Barnaby C Reeves, et al.. (2001). Randomised controlled trial of an integrated versus an optometric low vision rehabilitation service for patients with age‐related macular degeneration: study design and methodology. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 21(1). 36–44. 17 indexed citations
9.
Chauhan, Balwantray C., et al.. (1988). Cluster analysis in visual field quantification. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 69(1). 25–39. 23 indexed citations
10.
Henson, David, et al.. (1986). Frequency Distribution of Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects. Optometry and Vision Science. 63(6). 455–461. 65 indexed citations
11.
Henson, David, et al.. (1986). Importance of Visual Field Score and Asymmetry in the Detection of Glaucoma. Optometry and Vision Science. 63(9). 714–723. 5 indexed citations
12.
North, Rachel V. & David Henson. (1985). Adaptation to Lens-Induced Heterophorias. Optometry and Vision Science. 62(11). 774–780. 29 indexed citations
13.
Henson, David, et al.. (1985). Vergence-Adaptive Change with a Prism-Induced Noncomitant Disparity. Optometry and Vision Science. 62(3). 203–206. 10 indexed citations
14.
Henson, David, et al.. (1984). Adaptive Changes with Prolonged Effect of Comitant and Incomitant Vergence Disparities. Optometry and Vision Science. 61(8). 506–512. 16 indexed citations
15.
North, Rachel V. & David Henson. (1982). Effect of Orthoptics upon the Ability of Patients to Adapt to Prism-Induced Heterophoria. Optometry and Vision Science. 59(12). 983–986. 24 indexed citations
16.
North, Rachel V. & David Henson. (1981). Adaptation to Prism-Induced Heterophoria in Subjects with Abnormal Binocular Vision or Asthenopia. Optometry and Vision Science. 58(9). 746–752. 58 indexed citations
17.
Henson, David & Rachel V. North. (1980). ADAPTATION TO PRISM-INDUCED HETEROPHORIA. Optometry and Vision Science. 57(3). 129–137. 91 indexed citations
18.
Henson, David, et al.. (1979). Normative and Clinical Data with a New Type of Dark Adaptometer. Optometry and Vision Science. 56(4). 267–271. 3 indexed citations
19.
Millodot, Michel, David Henson, & Daniel J. O’Leary. (1979). Measurement of Corneal Sensitivity and Thickness with PMMA and Gas-Permeable Contact Lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 56(10). 628–632. 30 indexed citations
20.
Henson, David & Merrill J. Allen. (1977). A New Dark Adaptometer. Optometry and Vision Science. 54(9). 641–644. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026