Countries citing papers authored by Pamela A. Sample
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela A. Sample's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela A. Sample with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela A. Sample more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela A. Sample
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela A. Sample. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela A. Sample. The network helps show where Pamela A. Sample may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela A. Sample
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela A. Sample.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela A. Sample based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela A. Sample. Pamela A. Sample is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Leite, Mauro T., Linda M. Zangwill, Robert N. Weinreb, et al.. (2011). African Descent And Glaucoma Study (ADAGES): Comparison Of Rates Of Glaucomatous Progressive Nerve Fiber Layer Loss Between Patients Of European Descent And African-descent. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 4167–4167.8 indexed citations
Pascual, J.P., Jens Paetzold, Ulrich Schiefer, et al.. (2008). Determining Glaucomatous Progression by Linear Regression of Visual Field Locations Within Regions in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 1092–1092.1 indexed citations
7.
Nouri‐Mahdavi, Kouros, R. N. Weinreb, Joseph Caprioli, & Pamela A. Sample. (2008). Temporal and Topographic Distribution of Visual Field Progression With Guided Progression Analysis and Pointwise Linear Regression With Pattern Deviation Data. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 1090–1090.1 indexed citations
Medeiros, F. A., Christopher Bowd, Pamela A. Sample, et al.. (2004). Predicting Early Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 3305–3305.1 indexed citations
14.
Goldbaum, Michael H., Pamela A. Sample, Linda M. Zangwill, et al.. (2004). Probability of Glaucoma Determined from Standard Automated Perimetry and from Optic Disk Topography using Relevance Vector Machine Classifiers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 2137–2137.2 indexed citations
15.
Medeiros, F. A., Pamela A. Sample, Linda M. Zangwill, Christopher Bowd, & Robert N. Weinreb. (2003). Corneal Thickness as a Risk Factor for Visual field Loss in Patients with Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 1043–1043.
16.
Racette, Lyne, M. Roy Wilson, Linda M. Zangwill, Robert N. Weinreb, & Pamela A. Sample. (2003). Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Blacks: A Review. Survey of Ophthalmology. 48(3). 295–313.190 indexed citations
Sample, Pamela A., Charles Bosworth, & Robert N. Weinreb. (1998). Selectivity in Glaucoma Injury—Reply. Archives of Ophthalmology. 116(3). 397–397.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.