Evgeniya Kolomak
- Development top 2%
- Economic and Technological Developments in Russia 7
- Demography top 5%
- Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends 28
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis 20
- Spatial and Panel Data Analysis 8
- Economic Growth and Productivity 5
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 4
-
- Arctic and Russian Policy Studies 7
-
- Regional Economic Development and Innovation 4
- Co-authors
- V. А. KryukovР. Г. Кукушкин
In The Last Decade
Evgeniya Kolomak
35 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Development 69
- Demography 147
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 65
- Economics and Econometrics 143
- Fuel Technology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Evgeniya Kolomak
This map shows the geographic impact of Evgeniya Kolomak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evgeniya Kolomak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evgeniya Kolomak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evgeniya Kolomak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evgeniya Kolomak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evgeniya Kolomak. The network helps show where Evgeniya Kolomak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Evgeniya Kolomak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 17 | Evolution of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activities in Russia | 2014 | 1 |
| 18 | Urbanization and Economic Development in Russia | 2012 | 1 |
| 19 | Assessing how urbanization influence an economic growth in Russia | 2011 | 1 |
| 20 | Analyzing factors of regional competitiveness | 2009 | 1 |
About Evgeniya Kolomak
Evgeniya Kolomak is a scholar working on Demography, Development and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (28 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (20 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (8 papers), Economic and Technological Developments in Russia (7 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (7 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers) and Regional Economic Development and Innovation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (69 citations), Demography (147 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (65 citations). Evgeniya Kolomak has collaborated with scholars based in Russia and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include V. А. Kryukov and Р. Г. Кукушкин. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Research of Russia, Voprosy Ekonomiki, Area Development and Policy, Regional Science Policy & Practice and Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.