Area Development and Policy

227 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 227 papers published in Area Development and Policy in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Area Development and Policy usually cover Sociology and Political Science (81 papers), Political Science and International Relations (74 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (68 papers) specifically the topics of Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (25 papers), International Development and Aid (24 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Area Development and Policy are Michael Dunford, Deborah Bräutigam, Weidong Liu, Ivan Turok, Jamie Peck, Ray Hudson, Pádraig Carmody, Godfrey Yeung, Henry Wai‐chung Yeung and Ron Boschma.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Area Development and Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Area Development and Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Area Development and Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Area Development and Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Area Development and Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Area Development and Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Area Development and Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025