Everett W. Howe

880 citations
34 papers · 304 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Everett W. Howe

31 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Everett W. Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Geometry and Topology 259
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 52
  • Algebra and Number Theory 63
  • Mathematical Physics 92
  • Artificial Intelligence 154
Replace Karim Belabas with:
Karim Belabas France
Karl-Otto Stöhr Brazil
Eyal Z. Goren Canada
Ernst Kani Canada
Jaap Top Netherlands
Nils Bruin Canada
Amir Akbary Canada
Michael E. Zieve United States
B. Heinrich Matzat Germany
Josep González Spain
Everett W. Howe relative to Karim Belabas France Karim Belabas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Karim Belabas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Everett W. Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Everett W. Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Everett W. Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Everett W. Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Everett W. Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Everett W. Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Everett W. Howe. The network helps show where Everett W. Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Everett W. Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Everett W. Howe Line = papers co-authored together Everett W. Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200057
2 199528
3 200226
4
On the group orders of elliptic curves over finite fields
199321
5 200218
6 200916
7 199816
8 199516
9 200415
10 199612
11 200310
12 20119
13 20007
14
GENUS-2 JACOBIANS WITH TORSION POINTS OF LARGE ORDER
20167
15
19956
16 19965
17 19865
18 20045
19 20044
20 20084

About Everett W. Howe

Everett W. Howe is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems and Mathematical Physics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (25 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (19 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (9 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (8 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (6 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (3 papers) and Finite Group Theory Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (259 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (52 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (63 citations), Mathematical Physics (92 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (154 citations). Everett W. Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Bjorn Poonen, Franck Leprévost, Enric Nart, Hui June Zhu, Kristin Lauter, Vassil S. Dimitrov, Michael E. Zieve, Noam D. Elkies, Andrew Kresch and Jonas Bergström. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Number Theory, Annales de l’institut Fourier, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Compositio Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact