Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Association Between Initial Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Subsequent Long-Term Use Among Opioid-Naïve Patients: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study
2016250 citationsRichard A. Deyo, Sara E. Hallvik et al.Journal of General Internal Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Eve Dexter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eve Dexter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eve Dexter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eve Dexter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eve Dexter. The network helps show where Eve Dexter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eve Dexter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eve Dexter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eve Dexter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eve Dexter. Eve Dexter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Rasmussen, Carl Edward, et al.. (2017). Rural Curricular Guidelines Based on Practice Scope of Recent Residency Graduates Practicing in Small Communities.. PubMed. 49(8). 594–599.8 indexed citations
2.
Eiff, M. Patrice, Eve Dexter, Miguel Marino, et al.. (2017). Impact of Residency Training Redesign on Residents' Clinical Knowledge.. PubMed. 49(9). 693–698.4 indexed citations
Waller, Edmund K., et al.. (2017). Team Training in Family Medicine Residency Programs and Its Impact on Team-Based Practice Post-Graduation.. PubMed. 49(5). 346–352.5 indexed citations
5.
Eiff, M. Patrice, Richard A. Young, Eve Dexter, et al.. (2017). Scope of Practice Among Recent Family Medicine Residency Graduates.. PubMed. 49(8). 607–617.10 indexed citations
6.
Eiff, M. Patrice, et al.. (2017). Varied Rates of Implementation of Patient-Centered Medical Home Features and Residents' Perceptions of Their Importance Based on Practice Experience.. PubMed. 49(3). 183–192.1 indexed citations
7.
Carney, Patricia A., Eve Dexter, Miguel Marino, et al.. (2016). Association Between Patient- Centered Medical Home Features and Satisfaction With Family Medicine Residency Training in the US.. PubMed. 48(10). 784–794.2 indexed citations
Deyo, Richard A., Sara E. Hallvik, Christi Hildebran, et al.. (2016). Association Between Initial Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Subsequent Long-Term Use Among Opioid-Naïve Patients: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 32(1). 21–27.250 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.