Evandro Luiz Lopes
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Evandro Luiz Lopes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Evandro Luiz Lopes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Evandro Luiz Lopes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Evandro Luiz Lopes. Evandro Luiz Lopes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Evandro Luiz Lopes
64 papers receiving 552 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Evandro Luiz Lopes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evandro Luiz Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evandro Luiz Lopes. The network helps show where Evandro Luiz Lopes may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Evandro Luiz Lopes
This map shows the geographic impact of Evandro Luiz Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evandro Luiz Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evandro Luiz Lopes more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.