Eva Oernboel

909 citations
14 papers · 704 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Oernboel

14 papers receiving 674 citations

Peers

Eva Oernboel
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 326
  • Philosophy 113
  • Pharmacology 141
  • Family Practice 18
  • General Health Professions 171
Replace Elizabeth Hancock with:
Elizabeth Hancock United Kingdom
Laura Sirri Italy
Manuela Glattacker Germany
Ranjit C. Chacko United States
Marianne B. Kool Netherlands
Katharina Joest Germany
Nicole de Zoysa United Kingdom
Ian Stanley United Kingdom
Eline Thornquist Norway
Samantha D. Outcalt United States
Eva Oernboel relative to Elizabeth Hancock United Kingdom Elizabeth Hancock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Elizabeth Hancock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Oernboel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Oernboel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Oernboel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Oernboel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Oernboel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Oernboel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Oernboel. The network helps show where Eva Oernboel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Eva Oernboel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Oernboel Line = papers co-authored together Eva Oernboel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201920
2 201912
3 201723
4 201519
5 201111
6 201127
7 201143
8
A novel treatment approach for people with severe functional somatic syndromes (STreSS-1): Randomized trial
20102
9
Specialised treatment of patients with chronic functional disorders randomised controlled trial: description and preliminary results
20091
10 200847
11 200796
12 200583
13 2005195
14 2005125

About Eva Oernboel

Eva Oernboel is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Family Practice, Complementary and alternative medicine, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 704 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (326 citations), Philosophy (113 citations), Pharmacology (141 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and General Health Professions (171 citations). Eva Oernboel has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Per Fink, Lisbeth Frostholm, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Tomas Toft, Frede Olesen, John Weinman, Helge Kasch, Tina Birgitte Wisbech Carstensen, Troels S. Jensen and Alice Kongsted. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Psychosomatic Medicine, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Psychological Medicine and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026