Eva Janssen
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 11
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 2
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 1
- Co-authors
- Hein de Vries (9 shared papers)Liesbeth van Osch (8 shared papers)Lilian Lechner (8 shared papers)Erika A. Waters (6 shared papers)Yasmina Okan (1 shared paper)Mirta Galešić (1 shared paper)Math J. J. M. Candel (1 shared paper)Robert A. C. Ruiter (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychology and Health (3 papers)British Journal of Health Psychology (3 papers)Health Education Research (3 papers)Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2 papers)Nicotine & Tobacco Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Eva Janssen
16 papers receiving 468 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Applied Psychology 172
- General Decision Sciences 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 60
- Dermatology 47
- Sociology and Political Science 165
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Janssen
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Janssen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Janssen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Janssen. The network helps show where Eva Janssen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Janssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0 |
About Eva Janssen
Eva Janssen is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Dermatology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (10 papers), Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Media Influence and Health (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (172 citations), General Decision Sciences (28 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (60 citations), Dermatology (47 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (165 citations). Eva Janssen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Hein de Vries, Liesbeth van Osch, Lilian Lechner, Erika A. Waters, Yasmina Okan, Mirta Galešić, Math J. J. M. Candel, Robert A. C. Ruiter, Martina Sester and G. Aßmann. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, British Journal of Health Psychology, Health Education Research, Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.