Social Theory and Social Structure1958 · 7.0k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
1958The American Catholic Sociological Review
Peers
Eva J. Ross
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
Sociology and Political Science3.5k
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management755
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva J. Ross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva J. Ross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva J. Ross more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva J. Ross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva J. Ross. The network helps show where Eva J. Ross may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Eva J. Ross, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with Eva J. RossLine = papers co-authored togetherEva J. Ross links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.