Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Robert V. StickSpencer J. WilliamsAlan JohnStephen G. WithersG.J. DaviesJames P. LingfordEmilio L. GhisalbertiNichollas E. Scott
- Topics
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (21 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (16 papers)Enzyme Production and Characterization (10 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger
64 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Molecular Biology 960
- Organic Chemistry 889
- Plant Science 237
- Biotechnology 189
- Immunology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger
This map shows the geographic impact of Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger. The network helps show where Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger. Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 62 |
About Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger
Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Endocrinology and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (21 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (16 papers) and Enzyme Production and Characterization (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (889 citations), Biotechnology (189 citations) and Molecular Biology (960 citations). Ethan D. Goddard‐Borger has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert V. Stick, Spencer J. Williams, Alan John, Stephen G. Withers, G.J. Davies, James P. Lingford, Emilio L. Ghisalberti, Nichollas E. Scott, Yi Jin and Christina Tysoe. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.