Ethan Barbour

406 citations
14 papers · 324 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ethan Barbour

13 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Ethan Barbour
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 174
  • Computational Mechanics 157
  • Aerospace Engineering 161
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 38
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 47
Replace Takao Tsuboi with:
Takao Tsuboi Japan
Claude-Étienne Paillard France
Karl P. Chatelain Saudi Arabia
Georgii I. Tsvetkov Russia
Fabien Lafosse France
Jens Prager Germany
Victor I. Chernysh Russia
K. Ya. Troshin Russia
Keith D. Rein United States
Ashkan Movaghar United States
Ethan Barbour relative to Takao Tsuboi Japan Takao Tsuboi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Takao Tsuboi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ethan Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ethan Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethan Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethan Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ethan Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ethan Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ethan Barbour. The network helps show where Ethan Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ethan Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ethan Barbour Line = papers co-authored together Ethan Barbour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2010150
2 200965
3 200730
4 200521
5 200519
6 200812
7 20059
8 20047
9 20104
10 20053
11 20032
12
Modeling and laser-based sensing of pulsed detonation engines
20091
13 20181
14 20010

About Ethan Barbour

Ethan Barbour is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Spectroscopy, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Computational Mechanics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (9 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (4 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (3 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (2 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (2 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (174 citations), Computational Mechanics (157 citations), Aerospace Engineering (161 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (38 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (47 citations). Ethan Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald K. Hanson, David F. Davidson, Zekai Hong, Aamir Farooq, Chris Morris, Jay B. Jeffries, Matthew A. Oehlschlaeger, José Sinibaldi, Tao Tang and John Hoke. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Journal of Propulsion and Power, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series and 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact