et al.

453 total citations
26 papers, 254 citations indexed

About

et al. is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, et al. has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 254 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in et al.'s work include Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers) and Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (2 papers) et al. is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (4 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3 papers) and Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (2 papers) et al. collaborates with scholars based in United States, Greece and Japan et al.'s co-authors include Sarah Lichtenstein, R. Henderson, R. Dressler, H. W. Gäggeler, S. N. Dmitriev, A. V. Belozerov, G. A. Bozhikov, R. Eichler, V. A. Gorshkov and N. V. Aksenov and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

et al.

20 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers

et al.
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 58
  • Inorganic Chemistry 50
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 45
  • General Decision Sciences 28
Replace William J. Hurley with:
William J. Hurley Canada
Matthew T. Bowers United States
С. В. Шишкин Russia
Beverly J. Smith United States
Yolanda Gómez Spain
Elizabeth Wilson United States
M. Tǎnase Japan
L. Bovey United Kingdom
Evan Williams United States
J. Sell United States
William J. Hurley Canada View profile →
Citations per field, relative to et al.
et al. · 1×
Citations per year, relative to et al.
et al. · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by et al.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of et al.'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by et al. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites et al. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by et al.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by et al.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by et al.. The network helps show where et al. may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of et al.

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of et al.. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of et al. based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with et al.. et al. is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 1
7 2
8 0
9
Association between assisted reproductive technology and advanced retinopathy of prematurity
1
10 91
11
Validation of reported physical activity for cholesterol control using two different physical activity instruments
3
12
Rituximab: An emerging therapeutic agent for kidney transplantation
2
13 15
14
The osteoporotic male: Overlooked and undermanaged?
6
15 1
16 4
17 1
18 1
19 10
20 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026