William J. Hurley

54 total papers · 922 total citations
37 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

William J. Hurley is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, William J. Hurley has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in William J. Hurley's work include Sports Analytics and Performance (9 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (5 papers) and Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (4 papers). William J. Hurley is often cited by papers focused on Sports Analytics and Performance (9 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (5 papers) and Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (4 papers). William J. Hurley collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. William J. Hurley's co-authors include Lewis D. Johnson, Leonard V. Interrante, E. C. G. Sudarshan, Paul S. Marchetti, Gary E. Maciel, Irwin D. Kuntz, Wayde R. Schmidt, Robert H. Doremus, G. E. Leroi and Jack Brimberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and American Economic Review.

In The Last Decade

William J. Hurley

34 papers receiving 576 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William J. Hurley 139 99 99 98 86 37 624
Martin Schmidt 52 0.4× 20 0.2× 61 0.6× 3 0.0× 23 0.3× 92 753
Mariano Kulish 240 1.7× 172 1.7× 45 0.5× 3 0.0× 111 1.3× 64 781
Jean‐Guillaume Dumas 28 0.2× 155 1.6× 239 2.4× 69 0.7× 7 0.1× 86 639
Marco Lagi 58 0.4× 233 2.4× 311 3.1× 13 0.1× 13 0.2× 22 683
M. Kraus 12 0.1× 145 1.5× 155 1.6× 4 0.0× 7 0.1× 62 719
Mark Jones 30 0.2× 308 3.1× 110 1.1× 2 0.0× 3 0.0× 21 770
Peter M. Smith 81 0.6× 83 0.8× 185 1.9× 46 0.5× 22 0.3× 38 697
Jacques Peyrière 136 1.0× 50 0.5× 110 1.1× 110 1.3× 29 712
Jan Friedrich 13 0.1× 169 1.7× 79 0.8× 4 0.0× 22 0.3× 42 611
Johannes Schneider 179 1.3× 73 0.7× 58 0.6× 2 0.0× 102 1.2× 29 691

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Hurley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Hurley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Hurley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Hurley. The network helps show where William J. Hurley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Hurley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Hurley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Hurley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Hurley. William J. Hurley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026