Erwin Tegtmeier
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 5
- Philosophy and History of Science 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 4
- Co-authors
- Gustav Bergmann (1 shared paper)Reinhardt Grossmann (1 shared paper)Bernhard G. Humm (2 shared papers)Michaël Esfeld (1 shared paper)L. Nathan Oaklander (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Erwin Tegtmeier
14 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- History and Philosophy of Science 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
- Philosophy 59
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
- General Psychology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Tegtmeier
This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Tegtmeier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Tegtmeier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Tegtmeier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Tegtmeier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Tegtmeier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Tegtmeier. The network helps show where Erwin Tegtmeier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Erwin Tegtmeier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Realism : a critique of Brentano and Meinong | 1967 | 62 |
| 2 | 1991 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 8 | Grundzüge einer kategorialen Ontologie : Dinge, Eigenschaften, Beziehungen, Sachverhalte | 1992 | 4 |
| 9 | Ontology and Analysis: Essays and Recollections About Gustav Bergmann | 2007 | 4 |
| 10 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 11 | Komparative Begriffe : eine Kritik der Lehre von Carnap und Hempel | 1981 | 2 |
| 12 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 15 | Intentionality is not representation | 2005 | 1 |
| 16 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 18 | M ETAPHYSICA International Journal for Ontology & Metaphysics | 2003 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 0 |
About Erwin Tegtmeier
Erwin Tegtmeier is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Molecular Biology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Cognitive Computing and Networks (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations), Philosophy (59 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Erwin Tegtmeier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gustav Bergmann, Reinhardt Grossmann, Bernhard G. Humm, Michaël Esfeld and L. Nathan Oaklander. Their work appears in journals such as Metaphysica, Axiomathes, The Monist, Noûs and Manuscrito.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.