Erwin O. Smigel

754 citations
34 papers · 524 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Erwin O. Smigel

32 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Erwin O. Smigel
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Law 124
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 80
  • Gender Studies 60
  • Public Administration 22
  • Sociology and Political Science 199
Replace Anne Enquist with:
Anne Enquist United States
Lorraine K. Bannai United States
William Weaver
Christine Harrington United States
James MacGregor Burns United States
Phyllis A. Wallace
James Q. Whitman United States
Paul E. Sigmund United States
Anthony Heath South Korea
Molly B. Pepper United States
Erwin O. Smigel relative to Anne Enquist United States Anne Enquist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Anne Enquist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin O. Smigel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin O. Smigel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin O. Smigel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin O. Smigel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin O. Smigel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin O. Smigel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin O. Smigel. The network helps show where Erwin O. Smigel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Erwin O. Smigel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erwin O. Smigel Line = papers co-authored together Erwin O. Smigel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196479
2 196570
3 197145
4 195642
5 197130
6 196627
7 196423
8 196523
9 196822
10 196619
11 196617
12 197214
13 196912
14 196410
15 195410
16 197010
17 19659
18 19589
19 19658
20 19607

About Erwin O. Smigel

Erwin O. Smigel is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Accounting, Urban Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 34 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (9 papers), Business Law and Ethics (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (1 paper), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (124 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (80 citations), Gender Studies (60 citations), Public Administration (22 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (199 citations). Erwin O. Smigel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Detlev F. Vagts, John R. Stevenson, H. Laurence Ross, Bruce J Cohen, Jack Ladinsky, Joel B. Grossman, Jerome H. Skolnick, Elmer H. Johnson, Jerome E. Carlin and Herbert L. Packer. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Social Forces, American Journal of Sociology, The Yale Law Journal and Social Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact