This map shows the geographic impact of J. Ascard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Ascard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Ascard more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Ascard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Ascard. The network helps show where J. Ascard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Ascard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Ascard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Ascard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Ascard. J. Ascard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Woldetsadik, Kebede, U. Gertsson, & J. Ascard. (2016). Response of shallots to N, P, and K fertilizer rates. Tropical Agriculture. 79(4). 205–210.2 indexed citations
Ascard, J. & R.Y. van der Weide. (2007). Thermal weed control with the focus on flame weeding. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 6. 71–90.1 indexed citations
4.
Glemnitz, Michael, et al.. (2004). Composition of weed floras in different agricultural management systems within the European climatic gradient.. 58–68.7 indexed citations
5.
Andreasen, Christian, et al.. (2004). The sensitivity of field peas (Pisum sativum L.) to weed harrowing.. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 55–57.1 indexed citations
6.
Faustini, Francesca, R. Paolini, F. Saccardo, et al.. (2004). First results on the competitive ability of lentil (Lens culinaris) genotypes.. 41–42.1 indexed citations
7.
Riley, Hugh, et al.. (2004). Mulching compared to physical weed control measures in organically grown vegetables..2 indexed citations
8.
Hansson, David, Sven-Erik Svensson, D. C. Cloutier, et al.. (2004). Steaming soil in narrow strips for intra-row weed control in sugar beet..4 indexed citations
9.
Cloutier, D. C., et al.. (2004). The effect of blind harrowing using a flex-tine harrow or a rotary hoe combined with manure amendment on bread wheat yield.. 115–123.1 indexed citations
10.
Cloutier, D. C., et al.. (2004). Water-jet cutting of potato tops - some experiences from Sweden 2003..2 indexed citations
11.
Bastiaans, L., et al.. (2004). Row distance as a key to efficient weed management in organic sugar beets..1 indexed citations
12.
Harris, Paul M., et al.. (2004). A device to kill weed seeds captured during crop harvesting..2 indexed citations
Põldma, P., et al.. (2001). Influence of biological control of fungal diseases with Trichoderma spp. on yield and quality of onion.6 indexed citations
15.
Ascard, J., et al.. (1998). Mechanical weed control by torsion weeder - a new method to reduce herbicide use in sugar beets. Aspects of applied biology.2 indexed citations
Ascard, J.. (1995). Thermal weed control by flaming: biological and technical aspects..28 indexed citations
18.
Ascard, J.. (1995). Thermal weed control by flaming. Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)).8 indexed citations
19.
Oleszek, Wiesław, et al.. (1994). Brassicaceae as alternative plants for weed control in sustainable agriculture.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.