Ernst Käsemann
- Religious studies top 0.1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Archeology top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert C. TannehillGünther BornkammPaul J. AchtemeierJohannes FriedrichNorman PerrinLeander E. KeckWolfgang Kraus
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers)Theology and Canon Law Studies (5 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Ernst Käsemann
22 papers receiving 207 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Religious studies 324
- Sociology and Political Science 159
- Archeology 90
- Philosophy 82
- History 32
Countries citing papers authored by Ernst Käsemann
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst Käsemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst Käsemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst Käsemann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst Käsemann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst Käsemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst Käsemann. The network helps show where Ernst Käsemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernst Käsemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernst Käsemann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernst Käsemann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernst Käsemann. Ernst Käsemann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | In der Nachfolge des gekreuzigten Nazareners : Aufsätze und Vorträge aus dem Nachlass | 1 |
| 3 | 56 | |
| 4 | The Wandering People of God: An Investigation of the Letter to the Hebrews | 10 |
| 5 | Amt und Gemeinde im Neuen Testament | 0 |
| 6 | The Allegory of Abraham, Sarah and Hagar in the Argument of Galatians | 6 |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Perspectives on Paul | 20 |
| 10 | Das Neue Testament als Kanon : Dokumentation und kritische Analyse zur gegenwärtigen Diskussion | 2 |
| 11 | Exegetische Versuche und Besinnungen | 42 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | New Testament questions of today | 83 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Historisch=kritische Untersuchungen zum neuen Testament | 1 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | Eine paulinische Variation des "amor fati" | 1 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Ernst Käsemann
Ernst Käsemann is a scholar working on Religious studies, Development and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (5 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (324 citations), Archeology (90 citations) and Philosophy (82 citations). Ernst Käsemann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Tannehill, Günther Bornkamm, Paul J. Achtemeier, Johannes Friedrich, Norman Perrin, Leander E. Keck and Wolfgang Kraus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Novum Testamentum and New Testament Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.