Ernst A. Ruh
- Applied Mathematics top 1%
- Geometry and Topology top 1%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Co-authors
- Jaak VilmsKarsten GroveHermann KarcherMaung Min-OoMiroslav LovrićHans-Christoph Im HofChristian MazzaPeter March
- Topics
- Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (17 papers)Geometry and complex manifolds (8 papers)Advanced Differential Geometry Research (8 papers)
- Journals
- Transactions of the American Mathematical SocietyInventiones mathematicaeJournal of Differential Geometry
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ernst A. Ruh
27 papers receiving 489 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Applied Mathematics 494
- Geometry and Topology 405
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 168
- Mathematical Physics 119
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 55
Countries citing papers authored by Ernst A. Ruh
This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst A. Ruh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst A. Ruh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst A. Ruh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst A. Ruh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst A. Ruh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst A. Ruh. The network helps show where Ernst A. Ruh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernst A. Ruh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernst A. Ruh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernst A. Ruh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernst A. Ruh. Ernst A. Ruh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 64 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Ernst A. Ruh
Ernst A. Ruh is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (17 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (8 papers) and Advanced Differential Geometry Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (494 citations), Geometry and Topology (405 citations) and Mathematical Physics (119 citations). Ernst A. Ruh has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jaak Vilms, Karsten Grove, Hermann Karcher, Maung Min-Oo, Miroslav Lovrić, Hans-Christoph Im Hof, Christian Mazza, Peter March, Franz W. Kamber and Bruno Colbois. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Inventiones mathematicae and Journal of Differential Geometry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.