Ernie Croot

17 papers receiving 133 citations

Peers

Ernie Croot
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 100
  • Computational Mathematics 11
  • Algebra and Number Theory 40
  • Geometry and Topology 55
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 69
Replace Corrado Zanella with:
Corrado Zanella Italy
Apoorva Khare United States
Sandra Di Rocco Sweden
Dániel Gerbner Hungary
Tom Sanders United Kingdom
Kevin O’Bryant United States
Lê Anh Vinh Vietnam
Yufei Zhao United States
James Pommersheim United States
Sukumar Das Adhikari India
Ernie Croot relative to Corrado Zanella Italy Corrado Zanella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Corrado Zanella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ernie Croot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernie Croot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernie Croot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernie Croot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernie Croot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernie Croot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernie Croot. The network helps show where Ernie Croot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Ernie Croot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ernie Croot Line = papers co-authored together Ernie Croot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201657
2 201038
3 201011
4 20136
5 20045
6 20115
7 20055
8 20075
9 20085
10 20123
11 20072
12 20082
13 20052
14 20082
15 20101
16 20061
17 20101

About Ernie Croot

Ernie Croot is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (13 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (9 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (7 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (2 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (2 papers), Graph theory and applications (2 papers) and Algorithms and Data Compression (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (100 citations), Computational Mathematics (11 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (40 citations), Geometry and Topology (55 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (69 citations). Ernie Croot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vsevolod F. Lev, Derrick Hart, Tomasz Schoen, Hui June Zhu, Ren‐Cang Li, Imre Z. Ruzsa, Izabella Łaba, Andrew Granville, Robin Pemantle and Prasad Tetali. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Annals of Mathematics, International Journal of Number Theory, Discrete & Computational Geometry and Theoretical Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact