Erin Ash
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Sports, Gender, and Society
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
-
- Media Influence and Health
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 6
- Digital Games and Media 3
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 3
-
- Sports, Gender, and Society 7
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 4
- Co-authors
- Mary Beth Oliver (2 shared papers)Julia K. Woolley (2 shared papers)Gregory A. Cranmer (5 shared papers)Marie Hardin (3 shared papers)Mun‐Young Chung (1 shared paper)Jennifer Hoewe (1 shared paper)Erin Whiteside (2 shared papers)Mike Schmierbach (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Mass Communication & Society (3 papers)Communication & Sport (2 papers)Health Communication (2 papers)Howard Journal of Communications (1 paper)Games and Culture (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Erin Ash
20 papers receiving 255 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Gender Studies 89
- Literature and Literary Theory 84
- Communication 41
- Human-Computer Interaction 32
- Applied Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Erin Ash
This map shows the geographic impact of Erin Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erin Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erin Ash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erin Ash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erin Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erin Ash. The network helps show where Erin Ash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Erin Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 72 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 15 | Effects of a trend: The influence of user comments on readers' perceptions of online newspapers | 2009 | 2 |
| 16 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Erin Ash
Erin Ash is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (10 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (7 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (89 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (84 citations), Communication (41 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (32 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Erin Ash has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mary Beth Oliver, Julia K. Woolley, Gregory A. Cranmer, Marie Hardin, Mun‐Young Chung, Jennifer Hoewe, Erin Whiteside, Mike Schmierbach, Jimmy Sanderson and Bryan E. Denham. Their work appears in journals such as Mass Communication & Society, Communication & Sport, Health Communication, Howard Journal of Communications and Games and Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.