Erika N. Cline

1.2k citations
20 papers · 924 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Erika N. Cline

20 papers receiving 908 citations

Hit Papers

The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third...6512018202620202023200400600

Peers

Erika N. Cline
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Physiology 633
  • Biological Psychiatry 56
  • Neurology 129
  • Pharmacology 191
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 136
Replace Asa Hatami with:
Asa Hatami United States
Eric Y. Hayden United States
Thomas B. Ladd United States
Ashley N. Nilson United States
Hanna Laudon Sweden
Marta Pera Spain
Alfred T. Welzel Ireland
Asad Jan Denmark
Cristina D’Arrigo Italy
Susanne Frykman Sweden
Erika N. Cline relative to Asa Hatami United States Asa Hatami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Asa Hatami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erika N. Cline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erika N. Cline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika N. Cline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika N. Cline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erika N. Cline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika N. Cline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika N. Cline. The network helps show where Erika N. Cline may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erika N. Cline, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erika N. Cline Line = papers co-authored together Erika N. Cline links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20254
2 20252
3 20236
4 20234
5 202216
6 202230
7 202213
8 202112
9 20216
10 202011
11 201819
12
The Amyloid-β Oligomer Hypothesis: Beginning of the Third Decadebreakdown →
2018651
13
Alzheimer's Toxic Amyloid Beta Oligomers: Unwelcome Visitors to the Na/K ATPase alpha3 Docking Station.
201722
14 201421
15 201342
16 201242
17 20121
18 20102
19 20101
20 200919

About Erika N. Cline

Erika N. Cline is a scholar working on Physiology, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 924 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (11 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (2 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers (2 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (633 citations), Biological Psychiatry (56 citations) and Neurology (129 citations). Erika N. Cline has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include William L. Klein, Kirsten L. Viola, Maíra A. Bicca, Eric Siemers, Jasna Jerecı̀ć, Joseph Holoshitz, David A. Fox, Song Ling, Grant A. Krafft and Adriano Sebollela. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease, ACS Chemical Neuroscience, Tetrahedron Letters, Analytical Chemistry and International Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026