Erika Friedl
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Topics
- Islamic Studies and History (9 papers)Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers)Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (2 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsJournal for the Scientific Study of ReligionLanguage in Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Erika Friedl
19 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Sociology and Political Science 107
- Political Science and International Relations 105
- Anthropology 40
- Gender Studies 38
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Erika Friedl
This map shows the geographic impact of Erika Friedl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erika Friedl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erika Friedl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erika Friedl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erika Friedl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erika Friedl. The network helps show where Erika Friedl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erika Friedl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erika Friedl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erika Friedl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erika Friedl. Erika Friedl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Folktales and Storytellers of Iran: Culture, Ethos and Identity | 1 |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Muslim women and the politics of participation : implementing the Beijing platform | 14 |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Sources Of Female Power In Iran | 4 |
| 17 | In the Eye of the Storm: Women in Post-revolutionary Iran | 54 |
| 18 | Women of Deh Koh - Lives in an Iranian Village | 29 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Erika Friedl
Erika Friedl is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Museology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 24 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (9 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers) and Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (105 citations), Anthropology (40 citations) and Gender Studies (38 citations). Erika Friedl has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nayereh Tohidi, Agnes G. Loeffler, Mary Elaine Hegland and Marcia Texler Segal. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Language in Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.