Erik Angner

37 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

Erik Angner
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • General Decision Sciences 103
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Applied Psychology 69
  • Health 103
  • Social Psychology 254
Replace Dan Coates with:
Dan Coates United States
Odilo W. Huber Switzerland
Rodney L. Bassett United States
Sonya L. Britt United States
Phanikiran Radhakrishnan United States
Fabian Kosse Germany
Jan A. Feij Netherlands
Michelle L. Rheinschmidt United States
Jon Jachimowicz United States
Omar Paccagnella Italy
Erik Angner relative to Dan Coates United States Dan Coates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Dan Coates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Angner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Angner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Angner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Angner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Angner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Angner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Angner. The network helps show where Erik Angner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Erik Angner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erik Angner Line = papers co-authored together Erik Angner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010116
2 200986
3 201276
4
Predicting and indulging changing preferences.
200361
5 201659
6 201937
7 200930
8 201327
9 201125
10 200924
11 201821
12 201420
13 200817
14 200215
15 200815
16 200610
17
Subjective Measures of Well-Being: A philosophical examination
20059
18
Epistemic Humility—Knowing Your Limits in a Pandemic
20209
19 20048
20 20118

About Erik Angner

Erik Angner is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences and Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (14 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (12 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (103 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Applied Psychology (69 citations), Health (103 citations) and Social Psychology (254 citations). Erik Angner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeroan J. Allison, George Loewenstein, Midge N. Ray, Kenneth G. Saag, Daniel J. Amante, Sandral Hullett, Michael J. Miller, Catarina I. Kiefe, Daniel J. Cobaugh and Cynthia LaCivita. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Methodology, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Utilitas, Economics and Philosophy and European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact