Urte Roeber

1.3k total citations
45 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Urte Roeber is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Urte Roeber has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Urte Roeber's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (21 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (20 papers). Urte Roeber is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (21 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (20 papers). Urte Roeber collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Cuba. Urte Roeber's co-authors include Erich Schröger, Stefan Berti, Alexandra Bendixen, Andreas Widmann, Nelson J. Trujillo‐Barreto, Robert P. O’Shea, Dagmar Müller, Thomas Jacobsen, Sabine Grimm and Christian Kaernbach and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Urte Roeber

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Urte Roeber Germany	18	967	415	73	65	40	45	1.0k
Keith B. Doelling United States	8	994 1.0×	255 0.6×	78 1.1×	99 1.5×	126 3.1×	13	1.1k
Risto Näätänen Finland	10	764 0.8×	388 0.9×	40 0.5×	86 1.3×	42 1.1×	10	790
Nelson Cowan United States	7	507 0.5×	196 0.5×	43 0.6×	58 0.9×	78 1.9×	10	587
Yune Sang Lee United States	11	406 0.4×	156 0.4×	76 1.0×	41 0.6×	73 1.8×	22	476
Sabine Grimm Germany	26	1.6k 1.6×	618 1.5×	40 0.5×	189 2.9×	35 0.9×	63	1.6k
Heather Johnston United States	5	451 0.5×	153 0.4×	100 1.4×	73 1.1×	69 1.7×	8	514
Nathaniel S. Miller United States	5	420 0.4×	133 0.3×	86 1.2×	64 1.0×	59 1.5×	14	477
Noah MacKenzie United States	4	437 0.5×	192 0.5×	32 0.4×	63 1.0×	32 0.8×	5	488
Kelly L. McDonald Canada	12	732 0.8×	233 0.6×	30 0.4×	99 1.5×	20 0.5×	13	770
Diana Omigie United Kingdom	15	617 0.6×	222 0.5×	133 1.8×	129 2.0×	57 1.4×	41	678

Countries citing papers authored by Urte Roeber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Urte Roeber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Urte Roeber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urte Roeber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Urte Roeber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Urte Roeber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Urte Roeber. The network helps show where Urte Roeber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Urte Roeber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Urte Roeber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Urte Roeber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Urte Roeber. Urte Roeber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Roeber, Urte, et al.. (2025). Auditory facilitation in deterministic versus stochastic worlds. Cognitive Neuroscience. 16(1-4). 93–99.

Bendixen, Alexandra, et al.. (2024). Conditional deviant repetition in the oddball paradigm modulates processing at the level of P3a but not MMN. Psychophysiology. 61(6). e14545–e14545. 3 indexed citations

Oh, Rachel Rui Ying, Melissa Marselle, Erich Schröger, et al.. (2023). The more the merrier? Perceived forest biodiversity promotes short‐term mental health and well‐being—A multicentre study. People and Nature. 6(1). 180–201. 16 indexed citations

Roeber, Urte, et al.. (2023). That sounds awful! Does sound unpleasantness modulate the mismatch negativity and its habituation?. Psychophysiology. 61(2). e14450–e14450. 3 indexed citations

Bendixen, Alexandra, et al.. (2023). Deviants violating higher-order auditory regularities can become predictive and facilitate behaviour. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 85(8). 2731–2750. 2 indexed citations

Jack, Bradley N., Urte Roeber, & Robert P. O’Shea. (2017). Do early neural correlates of visual consciousness show the oblique effect? A binocular rivalry and event-related potential study. PLoS ONE. 12(12). e0188979–e0188979. 2 indexed citations

Roeber, Urte, et al.. (2013). Can eye of origin serve as a deviant? Visual mismatch negativity from binocular rivalry. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 190–190. 10 indexed citations

O’Shea, Robert P., Urte Roeber, & Jürgen Kornmeier. (2012). Predicting binocular rivalry alternations from brain activity. Journal of Vision. 12(9). 1268–1268. 1 indexed citations

Müller, Dagmar, Urte Roeber, István Winkler, et al.. (2012). Impact of lower- vs. upper-hemifield presentation on automatic colour-deviance detection: A visual mismatch negativity study. Brain Research. 1472. 89–98. 22 indexed citations

10.

Roeber, Urte. (2012). Neural processing of orientation differences between the eyes' images. Journal of Vision. 12(13). 20–20. 7 indexed citations

11.

Roeber, Urte, Sandra Veser, Erich Schröger, & Robert P. O’Shea. (2011). On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence. PLoS ONE. 6(7). e22612–e22612. 18 indexed citations

12.

Horváth, János, Urte Roeber, & Erich Schröger. (2010). The effects of response sharing and stimulus presentation frequency on event-related potentials in an auditory oddball paradigm. Psychophysiology. 47(5). 931–41. 1 indexed citations

13.

Horváth, János, Urte Roeber, & Erich Schröger. (2009). The utility of brief, spectrally rich, dynamic sounds in the passive oddball paradigm. Neuroscience Letters. 461(3). 262–265. 18 indexed citations

14.

Roeber, Urte, et al.. (2008). Cross-orientation interactions in human vision. Journal of Vision. 8(3). 15–15. 15 indexed citations

15.

Roeber, Urte, Andreas Widmann, Nelson J. Trujillo‐Barreto, et al.. (2008). Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: Time and place from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Vision. 8(3). 21–21. 39 indexed citations

16.

Schröger, Erich, Alexandra Bendixen, Nelson J. Trujillo‐Barreto, & Urte Roeber. (2007). Processing of Abstract Rule Violations in Audition. PLoS ONE. 2(11). e1131–e1131. 83 indexed citations

17.

Grimm, Sabine, Urte Roeber, Nelson J. Trujillo‐Barreto, & Erich Schröger. (2006). Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres. NeuroImage. 32(1). 275–282. 44 indexed citations

18.

Roeber, Urte, Stefan Berti, Andreas Widmann, & Erich Schröger. (2004). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research. 22(3). 451–456. 31 indexed citations

19.

Roeber, Urte & Christian Kaernbach. (2004). Searching beyond the limit—if there is one. Biological Trace Element Research. 202(5). 1928–1936. 1 indexed citations

20.

Madigan, Stephen, et al.. (2000). Retrieval latency and “at-risk” memories. Memory & Cognition. 28(4). 523–528. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact