Erich Bohl

890 citations
49 papers · 574 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Erich Bohl

46 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

Erich Bohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Numerical Analysis 137
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 181
  • Applied Mathematics 99
  • Mathematical Physics 75
  • Modeling and Simulation 31
Replace Josephus Hulshof with:
Josephus Hulshof Netherlands
Changchun Liu China
Renate Schaaf United States
Xin Lü China
V. A. Trenogin Russia
Hans‐Jürgen Schmeißer Germany
Messoud Efendiev Germany
S. De Lillo Italy
C. L. Frenzen United States
Guy Vallet France
Erich Bohl relative to Josephus Hulshof Netherlands Josephus Hulshof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Josephus Hulshof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erich Bohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erich Bohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erich Bohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erich Bohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erich Bohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erich Bohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erich Bohl. The network helps show where Erich Bohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Erich Bohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erich Bohl Line = papers co-authored together Erich Bohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200187
2 199666
3 199552
4 197448
5 198144
6 199541
7 198531
8 201319
9 198617
10 196617
11 196413
12 199712
13 197910
14 197910
15 19939
16 19958
17 19687
18 19916
19 19885
20 19675

About Erich Bohl

Erich Bohl is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Mathematical Physics, Numerical Analysis and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (6 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (6 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (4 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (4 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (137 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (181 citations), Applied Mathematics (99 citations), Mathematical Physics (75 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (31 citations). Erich Bohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Winfried Boos, Howard A. Shuman, Johannes Schropp, Bernd Rinn, W. Dieterich, Philipp Maass, Ivo Marek, Peter Lancaster, Jens Lorenz and Klaus Kirchgässner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Numerische Mathematik, Aequationes Mathematicae and Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact