Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring party positions in Europe
2012598 citationsRyan Bakker, Catherine E. De Vries et al.Party Politicsprofile →
Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data
2017469 citationsJonathan Polk, Jan Rovný et al.Research & Politicsprofile →
Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?
2010266 citationsLawrence Ezrow, Catherine E. De Vries et al.Party Politicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Erica Edwards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erica Edwards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erica Edwards more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erica Edwards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erica Edwards. The network helps show where Erica Edwards may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erica Edwards
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erica Edwards.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erica Edwards based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Erica Edwards. Erica Edwards is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Polk, Jonathan, Jan Rovný, Ryan Bakker, et al.. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics. 4(1).469 indexed citations breakdown →
Bakker, Ryan, Catherine E. De Vries, Erica Edwards, et al.. (2012). Measuring party positions in Europe. Party Politics. 21(1). 143–152.598 indexed citations breakdown →
Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine E. De Vries, Marco R. Steenbergen, & Erica Edwards. (2010). Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?. Party Politics. 17(3). 275–301.266 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Edwards, Erica. (2007). United We Stand? Examining Dissent within Political Parties on Issues of European Integration. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).3 indexed citations
Edwards, Erica, et al.. (2005). Taking Europe to its extremes: Examining cueing effects of right-wing populist parties on public opinion regarding European integration. Econstor (Econstor). 1–25.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.