Eric Weh

703 citations
22 papers · 486 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Eric Weh

22 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Eric Weh
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ophthalmology 266
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 194
  • Genetics 100
  • Molecular Biology 219
  • Cancer Research 45
Replace Megan Riker with:
Megan Riker United States
Mohamed F. El-Ashry United Kingdom
Cristina Martínez-Fernández de la Cámara United Kingdom
Ilaria Passerini Italy
Marie Burstedt Sweden
Christopher J. Layton Australia
Suddhasil Mookherjee India
Dan Yi Wang Hong Kong
Suzanne Broadgate United Kingdom
Tasneem P. Sharma United States
Eric Weh relative to Megan Riker United States Megan Riker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Megan Riker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Weh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Weh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Weh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Weh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Weh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Weh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Weh. The network helps show where Eric Weh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric Weh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Weh Line = papers co-authored together Eric Weh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010206
2 201453
3 201333
4 202030
5 202029
6 201727
7 201616
8 202215
9 201713
10 201613
11 202111
12
Analysis of CYP1B1 in pediatric and adult glaucoma and other ocular phenotypes.
201610
13 20166
14 20236
15 20236
16 20233
17 20233
18 20242
19 20251
20
Development of novel pyruvate kinase muscle isoform 2 (PKM2) activators for photoreceptor neuroprotection
20201

About Eric Weh

Eric Weh is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Cancer Research and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies (3 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (266 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (194 citations), Genetics (100 citations), Molecular Biology (219 citations) and Cancer Research (45 citations). Eric Weh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Elena V. Semina, Melissa Wagner-Schuman, Joseph Carroll, Daniel W. Odell, Alfredo Dubra, Adam M. Dubis, Yusufu N. Sulai, Yuming Lei, Linda M. Reis and Cagri G. Besirli. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, eLife, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Clinical Genetics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact