Clare Harries

1.5k total citations
25 papers, 835 citations indexed

About

Clare Harries is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Clare Harries has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 835 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Decision Sciences, 8 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Clare Harries's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers). Clare Harries is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers). Clare Harries collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Clare Harries's co-authors include Nigel Harvey, Mandeep K. Dhami, Ilan Fischer, Priscilla Harries, Ilan Yaniv, Ian Dennis, Gary L. Brase, Laurence Fiddick, Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and Olga Kostopoulou and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

In The Last Decade

Clare Harries

25 papers receiving 768 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Clare Harries United Kingdom 18 196 194 166 93 85 25 835
Tamra Pearson d’Estrée United States 7 173 0.9× 116 0.6× 122 0.7× 67 0.7× 112 1.3× 13 573
Barbara Forsyth United States 14 123 0.6× 196 1.0× 125 0.8× 106 1.1× 59 0.7× 19 915
Janet Grassia United States 6 195 1.0× 57 0.3× 138 0.8× 81 0.9× 120 1.4× 7 560
Eric Stone United States 7 194 1.0× 127 0.7× 268 1.6× 129 1.4× 41 0.5× 9 683
Kurt A. Carlson United States 19 430 2.2× 325 1.7× 175 1.1× 107 1.2× 148 1.7× 48 1.3k
Edgar C. Merkle United States 21 195 1.0× 112 0.6× 317 1.9× 205 2.2× 131 1.5× 72 1.4k
Claudia González‐Vallejo United States 18 683 3.5× 141 0.7× 253 1.5× 84 0.9× 110 1.3× 39 1.3k
Paul Rogers United Kingdom 25 92 0.5× 533 2.7× 86 0.5× 45 0.5× 325 3.8× 137 2.2k
David Tuckett United Kingdom 23 138 0.7× 266 1.4× 99 0.6× 30 0.3× 198 2.3× 89 1.7k
A. John Maule United Kingdom 15 357 1.8× 291 1.5× 288 1.7× 181 1.9× 298 3.5× 30 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Clare Harries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Harries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Harries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Harries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clare Harries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Harries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Harries. The network helps show where Clare Harries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clare Harries

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clare Harries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clare Harries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clare Harries. Clare Harries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dhami, Mandeep K. & Clare Harries. (2009). Information search in heuristic decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 24(4). 571–586. 19 indexed citations
2.
Sevdalis, Nick, et al.. (2008). Judgment analysis: a method for quantitative evaluation of trainee surgeons’ judgments of surgical risk. The American Journal of Surgery. 195(2). 183–188. 21 indexed citations
3.
Harvey, Nigel, et al.. (2008). Trust in motives, trust in competence: Separate factors determining the effectiveness of risk communication. Judgment and Decision Making. 3(1). 111–120. 84 indexed citations
4.
Kostopoulou, Olga, et al.. (2008). Predictors of Diagnostic Accuracy and Safe Management in Difficult Diagnostic Problems in Family Medicine. Medical Decision Making. 28(5). 668–680. 43 indexed citations
5.
Harvey, Nigel, et al.. (2008). Making Decisions for Other People: The Problem of Judging Acceptable Levels of Risk. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung. 7(1). 9. 3 indexed citations
6.
Harries, Clare, et al.. (2008). Learning to Use and Assess Advice about Risk. Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Freie Universität Berlin). 7(1). 6. 2 indexed citations
7.
Sasse, M. Angela, et al.. (2007). “The Devil You Know Knows Best” – How Online Recommendations Can Benefit From Social Networking. Electronic workshops in computing. 5 indexed citations
8.
Witteman, Cilia, et al.. (2006). Evaluating psychodiagnostic decisions. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 13(1). 10–15. 7 indexed citations
9.
Harries, Clare, et al.. (2006). Accounting for taste. 1057–1066. 37 indexed citations
10.
Harries, Clare, Ilan Yaniv, & Nigel Harvey. (2004). Combining advice: the weight of a dissenting opinion in the consensus. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 17(5). 333–348. 49 indexed citations
11.
Gómez-Beldarrain, Marian, et al.. (2004). Patients with Right Frontal Lesions are Unable to Assess and Use Advice to Make Predictive Judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 16(1). 74–89. 32 indexed citations
12.
Greenhalgh, Trisha, Olga Kostopoulou, & Clare Harries. (2004). Making decisions about benefits and harms of medicines. BMJ. 329(7456). 47–50. 18 indexed citations
13.
Harvey, Nigel & Clare Harries. (2003). Effects of judges' forecasting on their later combination of forecasts for the same outcomes. International Journal of Forecasting. 20(3). 391–409. 52 indexed citations
14.
Harries, Clare. (2003). Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision making?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 70(8). 797–817. 80 indexed citations
15.
Hardman, David J. & Clare Harries. (2002). How rational are we. Psychologist. 5 indexed citations
16.
Harries, Priscilla & Clare Harries. (2001). Studying Clinical Reasoning, Part 2: Applying Social Judgement Theory. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 64(6). 285–292. 23 indexed citations
17.
Harries, Clare & Nigel Harvey. (2000). Taking advice, using information and knowing what you are doing. Acta Psychologica. 104(3). 399–416. 23 indexed citations
18.
Harries, Clare & Nigel Harvey. (2000). Are absolute frequencies, relative frequencies, or both effective in reducing cognitive biases?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 13(4). 431–444. 13 indexed citations
19.
Harvey, Nigel, Clare Harries, & Ilan Fischer. (2000). Using Advice and Assessing Its Quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 81(2). 252–273. 84 indexed citations
20.
Harries, Clare & Mandeep K. Dhami. (2000). On the descriptive validity and prescriptive utility of fast and frugal models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23(5). 753–754. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026