Eric Scott
About
In The Last Decade
Eric Scott
7 papers receiving 146 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Molecular Biology 119
- Cancer Research 56
- Genetics 37
- Artificial Intelligence 26
- Oncology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Scott. The network helps show where Eric Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Scott. Eric Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 82 | |
| 7 | Intracerebral thrombosis. Case report and brief clinical review. | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.