Eric Schmutz

423 citations
28 papers · 223 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Eric Schmutz

27 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Eric Schmutz
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 89
  • Algebra and Number Theory 75
  • Mathematical Physics 78
  • Geometry and Topology 54
  • Statistics and Probability 32
Replace Wen-Ching Winnie Li with:
Wen-Ching Winnie Li United States
William M. Y. Goh United States
А. Г. Постников United States
Greg Martin Canada
Katalin Gyarmati Hungary
Svante Linusson Sweden
Ulf Rehmann Germany
David P. Roselle United States
David Singmaster United Kingdom
B. Crstici Romania
Eric Schmutz relative to Wen-Ching Winnie Li United States Wen-Ching Winnie Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Wen-Ching Winnie Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Schmutz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Schmutz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Schmutz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Schmutz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Schmutz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Schmutz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Schmutz. The network helps show where Eric Schmutz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Eric Schmutz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Schmutz Line = papers co-authored together Eric Schmutz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199161
2 199524
3 199317
4 199116
5 200816
6 200213
7 199111
8 20028
9 20158
10 19925
11 19935
12 19944
13 19894
14 19944
15
Comparison of Two CDS Algorithms on Random Unit Ball Graphs.
20054
16 19954
17 19943
18 19943
19 20102
20 20062

About Eric Schmutz

Eric Schmutz is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 28 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (8 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (7 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (6 papers), Graph theory and applications (5 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (5 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (5 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (5 papers) and Mathematical Approximation and Integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (89 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (75 citations), Mathematical Physics (78 citations), Geometry and Topology (54 citations) and Statistics and Probability (32 citations). Eric Schmutz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include William M. Y. Goh, P. Erdös, Carl Pomerance, Robin A. E. Carr, Harald Klingemann, Kurt Laederach and Sheng Li. Their work appears in journals such as Random Structures and Algorithms, Algorithmica, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Combinatorics Probability Computing and Finite Fields and Their Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact