Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth
20016.2k citationsDavid M. Olson, Eric Dinerstein et al.BioScienceprofile →
The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions
19981.2k citationsDavid M. Olson, Eric DinersteinConservation Biologyprofile →
The Global 200: Priority Ecoregions for Global Conservation
20021.1k citationsDavid M. Olson, Eric Dinersteinprofile →
A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets
2019466 citationsEric Dinerstein, Carly Vynne et al.Science Advancesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Dinerstein
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Dinerstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Dinerstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Dinerstein more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Dinerstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Dinerstein. The network helps show where Eric Dinerstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Dinerstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Dinerstein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Dinerstein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Dinerstein. Eric Dinerstein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dinerstein, Eric, Carly Vynne, Enric Sala, et al.. (2019). A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets. Science Advances. 5(4). eaaw2869–eaaw2869.466 indexed citations breakdown →
Dinerstein, Eric. (2013). The Kingdom of Rarities. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).3 indexed citations
Seidensticker, John, Eric Dinerstein, Surendra Prakash Goyal, et al.. (2010). Tiger range collapse at the base of the Himalayas: a case study. Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution).1 indexed citations
8.
Sanderson, Eric W., Jessica Forrest, Colby Loucks, et al.. (2010). Setting priorities for conservation and recovery of wild tigers: 2005-2015. The technical assessment. DSpace Repository (Smithsonian).39 indexed citations
9.
Dinerstein, Eric, Colby Loucks, Eric Wikramanayake, et al.. (2007). The Fate of Wild Tigers. BioScience. 57(6). 508–514.235 indexed citations
Higgins, Jonathan, Taylor H. Ricketts, Jeffrey Parrish, et al.. (2004). Beyond Noah: Saving Species Is Not Enough. Conservation Biology. 18(6). 1672–1673.27 indexed citations
Olson, David M., Eric Dinerstein, Eric Wikramanayake, et al.. (2001). Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth. BioScience. 51(11). 933–933.6185 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.