Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity
20111.5k citationsLian Pin Koh, Barry W. Brook et al.profile →
Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation
20021.4k citationsWilliam F. Laurance, Thomas Ε. Lovejoy et al.profile →
Principles of Conservation Biology
19951.1k citationsThomas Ε. Lovejoy et al.profile →
The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: A 32-year investigation
2010689 citationsWilliam F. Laurance, José Luís Camargo et al.Biological Conservationprofile →
Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants
1999630 citationsThomas Ε. Lovejoy, Richard O. Bierregaard et al.Biological Conservationprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ε. Lovejoy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ε. Lovejoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ε. Lovejoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ε. Lovejoy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ε. Lovejoy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ε. Lovejoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ε. Lovejoy. The network helps show where Thomas Ε. Lovejoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Ε. Lovejoy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Ε. Lovejoy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Ε. Lovejoy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Ε. Lovejoy. Thomas Ε. Lovejoy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Koh, Lian Pin, Barry W. Brook, Toby Gardner, et al.. (2011). Primary Forests Are Vital For Sustaining Tropical Biodiversity. AGUFM. 2011.1 indexed citations
10.
Houtan, Kyle S. Van, Stuart L. Pimm, Richard O. Bierregaard, Thomas Ε. Lovejoy, & Philip C. Stouffer. (2006). Local extinctions in flocking birds in Amazonian forest fragments. Evolutionary ecology research. 8(1). 129–148.43 indexed citations
Diamond, Antony W. & Thomas Ε. Lovejoy. (1985). Conservation of tropical forest birds : proceedings of a workshop and symposium held at the XVIII World Conference of the International Council for Bird Preservation, 7,8, and 10 August 1982, Kings College, Cambridge, England.19 indexed citations
18.
Prance, Ghillean Τ., et al.. (1981). Conservation progress in Amazonia: a structural review.. PARKS. 6(2). 5–10.14 indexed citations
19.
Lovejoy, Thomas Ε.. (1980). Discontinuous wilderness: minimum areas for conservation.. PARKS. 5(2). 13–15.25 indexed citations
20.
Lovejoy, Thomas Ε.. (1979). The epoch of biotic impoverishment. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 3(1). 2.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.