Emma C. Underwood
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.2%
- Ecology top 0.2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.2%
- Ecological Modeling top 0.1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Neil BurgessTaylor H. RickettsEric DinersteinDavid M. OlsonJohn C. MorrisonJohn F. LamoreuxGeorge V. N. PowellHolly Strand
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (16 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma C. Underwood
39 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Global and Planetary Change 4.0k
- Ecology 3.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.1k
- Ecological Modeling 2.2k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Emma C. Underwood
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma C. Underwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma C. Underwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma C. Underwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma C. Underwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma C. Underwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma C. Underwood. The network helps show where Emma C. Underwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma C. Underwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma C. Underwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma C. Underwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma C. Underwood. Emma C. Underwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 115 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 130 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 310 | |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 53 | |
| 16 | 358 | |
| 17 | 72 | |
| 18 | Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Servicesbreakdown → | 907 |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earthbreakdown → | 6185 |
About Emma C. Underwood
Emma C. Underwood is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 41 papers that have together received 9.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (16 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (2.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.1k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (4.0k citations). Emma C. Underwood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Burgess, Taylor H. Ricketts, Eric Dinerstein, David M. Olson, John C. Morrison, John F. Lamoreux, George V. N. Powell, Holly Strand, Thomas F. Allnutt and Colby Loucks. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.