Emma C. Underwood

12.5k citations
41 papers · 9.3k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 22

Emma C. Underwood

39 papers receiving 8.9k citations

Hit Papers

Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services90720012026200920172.0k4.0k6.0k

Peers

Emma C. Underwood
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Ecological Modeling 2.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.1k
  • Global and Planetary Change 4.0k
  • Ecology 3.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
Replace Colby Loucks with:
Colby Loucks United States
Eric Wikramanayake United States
Thomas F. Allnutt United States
George V. N. Powell United States
Yumiko Kura United States
Stephen E. Fick United States
Arturo Sánchez‐Azofeifa Canada
John F. Lamoreux United States
Holly Strand United States
Prashant Hedao United States
Emma C. Underwood relative to Colby Loucks United States Colby Loucks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Colby Loucks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma C. Underwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma C. Underwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma C. Underwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma C. Underwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma C. Underwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma C. Underwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma C. Underwood. The network helps show where Emma C. Underwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma C. Underwood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma C. Underwood Line = papers co-authored together Emma C. Underwood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20241
3 20240
4 20232
5 20234
6 201913
7 201825
8 201710
9 2011115
10 201026
11 2008130
12 200829
13 2008310
14 200873
15 200853
16 2007358
17 200672
18
Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Servicesbreakdown →
2006907
19 200621
20
Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earthbreakdown →
20016185

About Emma C. Underwood

Emma C. Underwood is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 41 papers that have together received 9.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (16 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (2.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.1k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (4.0k citations). Emma C. Underwood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Neil Burgess, Taylor H. Ricketts, Eric Dinerstein, David M. Olson, John C. Morrison, John F. Lamoreux, George V. N. Powell, Holly Strand, Thomas F. Allnutt and Colby Loucks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026